22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T436,MEMORANDUM Jose Luis Pazarin-Castrejon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review. The IJ properly concluded that Pazarin-Castrejon’s conviction for violating California Health and Safety Code § 11378 is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(B). See Rendon v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 967, 976 (9th Cir.2008) (“[P]ossession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell contains a trafficking element and is an aggravated felony.”); see also United States v. Valle-Montalbo, 474 F.3d 1197, 1201 (9th Cir.2007) (section 11378 criminalizes only possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.24:T463,

MEMORANDUM

Jose Luis Pazarin-Castrejon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

The IJ properly concluded that Pazarin-Castrejon’s conviction for violating California Health and Safety Code § 11378 is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(B). See Rendon v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 967, 976 (9th Cir.2008) (“[P]ossession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell contains a trafficking element and is an aggravated felony.”); see also United States v. Valle-Montalbo, 474 F.3d 1197, 1201 (9th Cir.2007) (section 11378 criminalizes only possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.