Grimes

Grimes v. Carter

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1289·241 Cal. App. 2d 694·50 Cal. Rptr. 808·19 A.L.R. 3d 1310
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 1966Civ. 578California3,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

Conley, J.

The question to be determined on this appeal is whether a plaintiff may escape the necessity of filing the undertaking required by section 830 of the Code of Civil Procedure in an action based on the classical elements of slander by claiming that the damages sought arise wholly from an invasion of plaintiff’s privacy or because of her consequent emotional distress. The judgment of dismissal was preceded by an order sustaining a general demurrer to the amended complaint without leave to amend and granting a motion to dismiss because of a failure to post the required bond.

We have reached the conclusion that, in the circumstances shown by the record, it was essential that plaintiff file such an undertaking in the sum of $500, and that because of her failure to do so and her formal written statement that she -would not, the trial court was correct in its ruling and its dismissal of the action.

The plaintiff, Betty Grimes, sets up her claim against the defendant in four causes of action. The amended pleading is entitled “First Amended Complaint for Damages for Invasion of Privacy, Intentional Causing of Mental, Emotional and Physical Distress and Attempt to Influence Plaintiff from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.