United States Steel Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1262·241 Cal. App. 2d 461·50 Cal. Rptr. 576
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 12, 1966Civ. 11082California5,761 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bray, J.

Plaintiff United States Steel Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Steel) appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant Transport Indemnity Company (hereinafter referred to as Transport) on plaintiff’s complaint, and together with cross-defendant Insurance Company of North America (hereinafter referred to as INA), from a judgment in favor of Transport on the latter’s cross-complaint.

Questions Presented

1. Was Steel an “additional insured” under the Transport policy ?

2. Was Steel “using” the Bigge truck within the meaning of the Transport policy ?

3. Was Steel expressly excluded from that policy?

4. Is Transport’s policy excess over INA?

Record

Steel brought this action in declaratory relief against Transport to secure a declaration that a Transport policy issued to Bigge Drayage Company, a corporation, covered Steel as an additional insured. Transport in turn by cross-complaint against Steel and INA sought a declaration that INA was the sole insurer covering Steel and that, in any event, Transport’s policy was excess insurance over the INA policy. INA admitted coverage except as to $100,000 and claimed that any liability over that amount should be prorated between the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.