Culp

People v. Culp

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1249·241 Cal. App. 2d 352·50 Cal. Rptr. 471
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 4, 1966Crim. 3969California3,636 words

Opinion

Opinion

Good, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of a charge of voluntary manslaughter. The ease was tried shortly before the decision in Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 [ 85 S.Ct. 1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 ], proscribed any reference to a defendant’s failure to testify in a criminal case. The district attorney argued the adverse inferences that pre-Griffin could be drawn from a defendant’s failure to testify and the court gave the standard instruction, CALJIC 51 Revised, which contained a comprehensive statement of the theretofore accepted California law on the subject. A fairly detailed statement of facts is necessary herein because one of the main questions presented is whether upon the evidence properly admitted at the trial a result more favorable to the defendant could be reasonably expected if a retrial was had with the error eliminated. The facts are as follows:

In midafternoon of February 28, 1965, James Lynne Crone was found dead in a cabin outside of Tulelake, California. He had been living at the cabin with defendant Culp and Delbert Pruett, a codefendant who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter. Death had occurred between 6 and 9 o’clock that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.