Pratt

Pratt v. Local 683, Film Technicians

Good Law
1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 1887·260 Cal. App. 2d 545·67 Cal. Rptr. 483
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 1968Civ. 31069California6,745 words

Opinion

Opinion

Frampton, J.

Preliminary Statement

The parties to this litigation are and will be hereinafter referred to as follows:

A general outline of the dispute, of -procedures taken, and of remedies sought prior to the filing of the complaint in the present action may be summarized as follows:

Plaintiff’s complaint sets forth three causes of action. In the first cause of action he alleges in substance, as against Union and Haggerty, that (1) plaintiff was an employee of General; (2) he was a member of the defendant Union; (3) Union was his collective bargaining representative and was obligated by virtue of its constitution and by-laws to represent plaintiff in any grievance plaintiff might have against General through the grievance procedures set forth in the collective bargaining agreements between General and Union; (4) on or about December 31, 1964, General discharged plaintiff from his employment without just cause; (5) plaintiff filed with Union a grievance complaint protesting his discharge ; (6) it was the contractual duty of Union and Haggerty to represent plaintiff in the grievance procedures fairly, loyally and in good faith, and Union and Haggerty violated their contractual duty to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.