Faust

Arrowhead Mut. Service Co. v. Faust

Good Law
1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 1888·260 Cal. App. 2d 567·67 Cal. Rptr. 325
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 1968Civ. 8364California4,402 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gabbert, J.

—Defendant Faust appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs after a court trial. The action was brought to restrain Faust from carrying on a real estate business on a lot owned by him in claimed violation of certain restrictions on the use of the lot for other than residential purposes.

The plaintiff Arrowhead Mutual Service Company (hereinafter referred to as Mutual Company) was the claimed owner of reversionary rights in the tract of land later described. The Mutual Company was a wholly owned subsidiary of plaintiff Lake Arrowhead Development Company (hereinafter referred to as'Development Company). The Development Company for some ji'ears had acted in several capacities in the resort area of Lake Arrowhead in the San Bernardino: Mountains. Among other things it had engaged in real estate subdivision development in an area called Arrowhead Woods. The owners of three lots in the traht of land involved were also joined as plaintiffs. The three-lot owners sought injunctive relief independently of the Mutual Company seeking to enforce recorded tract restrictions. The Mutual Company, joined by its parent the Development Company, sought a decree that it was the owner of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.