Adoption of Bonner

Good Law
1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 1816·260 Cal. App. 2d 17·66 Cal. Rptr. 812
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 1968Civ. 31281California2,078 words

Opinion

Opinion

Katz, J.

pro tem. —Harry and Betty Bonner, husband and wife, filed a petition to adopt Laura Ann Bonner, a minor. They alleged that Madeline Zellman was the natural mother of the child, that she had abandoned the child, and that her whereabouts were unknown. Pursuant to section 226.6 of the Civil Code, the Los Angeles County Bureau of Adoptions made an investigation and submitted its report and recommendation to the court below. That report is the source of facts hereafter recited.

According to petitioner Harry Bonner, while he was married to his former wife, Mildred Bonner, the objector herein, he learned from a fellow employee that Madeline Zellman was looking for a home for her unborn child. He arranged for her to live with his sister during her pregnancy. When Madeline entered the hospital for delivery, she registered under the name of Mildred, and, upon birth of the child, gave Harry’s name as the father. The ages of the parents thus listed on the child’s birth certificate did not correspond to Mildred’s or Harry’s age. Neither Harry nor Mildred were the natural parents, and Mildred was unable to have children. On leaving the hospital, Madeline gave the child to Harry. The facts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.