Tucker

Tucker v. Centennial Ins. Co.

Good Law
1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 1722·247 Cal. App. 2d 685·56 Cal. Rptr. 17·32 Cal. Comp. Cases 25
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 1967Civ. 8188California388 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

Plaintiff, Prentiss N. Tucker, appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend on the ground it failed to state a cause of action.

The complaint was in declaratory relief; plaintiff insured sought to determine defendant Centennial Insurance Company’s duty to defend an action brought before the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board by Walter L. Miller. Miller, manager of an apartment building owned by plaintiff, was injured while descending from the roof of the building after fixing a television antenna.

The Special Multi-Peril Policy issued by Centennial to plaintiff provides: “This Company will pay on behalf of the Insured all sums which the Insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury or property damage to which this Section applies, arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the premises and all operations necessary or incidental thereto, and this Company shall defend any suit against the Insured alleging such bodily injury or property damage and seeking damages which are payable under the terms of this Section, even if any of the allegations of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.