People Ex Rel. City of Bellflower v. Bellflower Cty. Water Dist.

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 971·247 Cal. App. 2d 344·55 Cal. Rptr. 584
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 1966Civ. 30409California3,159 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lillie, J.

It being contended that defendant water district, upon the inclusion of its entire area within the corporate limits of relator city, became merged by operation of law with that municipality, the existence of defendant was challenged by this quo warranto proceeding. After a trial, mostly on questions of law, judgment was rendered for defendant from which the People appeal.

The complaint alleged, and the answer admitted, that Bell-flower became an incorporated city on September 3, 1957, on which date the entire territory within the limits of defendant district, organized as a public corporation on March 27, 1957, under provisions of the Water Code, was included within the city’s boundaries. The defendant not having formally consented to the above inclusion of its territory, and the city apparently not having theretofore sought such consent, on August 27, 1962, its council adopted a resolution declaring the fact of such merger; this resolution followed the decision of this court in the Downey case (April 23, 1962), infra; thereafter, the instant action was commenced on August 27, 1963, to obtain an adjudication to that effect. Invoked by plaintiff was the doctrine of merger from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.