Eastwest United Group, Inc. v. Bell Flavors and Fragrances, I

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 201110-55256California284 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

JUL 15 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

NOT FOR PUBLICATION U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EASTWEST UNITED GROUP, INC., No. 10-55256

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-04677-SJO (RC)

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BELL FLAVORS AND

FRAGRANCES, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 9, 2011** Pasadena, California

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. **

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and IKUTA, Circuit Judge, and PIERSOL, Senior District Judge.***

The district court did not err in determining that Bell Flavors is not the

alter ego of West Grand Companies. First, Eastwest failed to show that

there was such a “unity of interest and ownership” between the companies

that their “separate personalities” ceased to exist. Mid-Century Ins. Co. v.

Gardner, 9…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.