Eastwest United Group, Inc. v. Bell Flavors and Fragrances, I
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
JUL 15 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
NOT FOR PUBLICATION U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EASTWEST UNITED GROUP, INC., No. 10-55256
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-04677-SJO (RC)
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BELL FLAVORS AND
FRAGRANCES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 9, 2011** Pasadena, California
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. **
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and IKUTA, Circuit Judge, and PIERSOL, Senior District Judge.***
The district court did not err in determining that Bell Flavors is not the
alter ego of West Grand Companies. First, Eastwest failed to show that
there was such a “unity of interest and ownership” between the companies
that their “separate personalities” ceased to exist. Mid-Century Ins. Co. v.