Hunt

Aetion for damages resulting from a collision of automobiles at an intersection of streets in Los Angeles. ' "•" ;

Plaintiff Miss'Hunt "was driving her automobile north on Las Palmas Street, andplaintift Mrs., Double ivas a passenger in the automobile. Defendant Mrs! [Burgess was driving her automobile east on Lexington Street- - .

The verdict, as to plaintiff .Hunt, was a,“We, the jury . . . find, for--the defendant v0 . ,. aud -against -the plaintiff Patricia Hunt.’’- . - - - L- •

•The verdict, as to plaintiff Double, was: “We the jury",:'. . , find for the plaintiff, Barbara Double, and against the defendant, Connie M. Burgess,: and -assess plaintiff’s damages in the'rsum of $ nothing."”

The judgment, upon' the verdicts, was that plaintiffs take nothing.by the complaint, and that,the defendant recover costs.

Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was denied. They appeal from the judgment.

The complaint alleged that plaintiff Hunt sustained personal injuries as a result of the collision, and thereby was damaged in the amount of $2,500; and her automobile was damaged in the amount of $100. It was alleged therein that plaintiff Double sustained personal injuries as a result of…