People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. City of Fresno

Good Law
1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 1596·210 Cal. App. 2d 500·26 Cal. Rptr. 853
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 6, 1962Civ. 6577California5,294 words

Opinion

Opinion

Coughlin, J.

The issue for determination in this action was whether the owner of a determinable fee estate in a parcel of real property, which was part of a larger parcel conveyed for a limited use, and which subsequently was taken through eminent domain proceedings, or the owner of the reversionary interest in the property taken, was entitled to the compensation awarded for such taking. The trial court found in favor of the latter. The primary issues on appeal are threefold, viz., (1) whether the evidence sustains a finding that the determinable fee estate had terminated before the taking in question, thus entitling the owner of the reversionary interest to the award; (2) whether the subject taking, by preventing further use of the property for the limited purpose designated in the grant, entitled the owner of the reversionary interest to the award even though the determinable fee had not previously terminated; and (3) whether, under the evidence in this case, expiration of the determinable fee was imminent and therefore authorized recovery of the award, in whole or in part, by the owners of the reversionary interest.

By a deed dated February 26, 1929, Hr. and Mrs. Wilbur F. Chandler…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.