Jacobs

Jacobs v. Medford

Good Law
1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 1557·210 Cal. App. 2d 164·26 Cal. Rptr. 591
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 1962Civ. 26326California3,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wood, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in this action for damages for infringement of plaintiff’s alleged rights in a literary composition.

The complaint alleges as follows: That between March 1944 and January 1948 the plaintiff conceived, originated, and wrote a new and original manuscript titled “No Alternative.” That said work was completed in January 1948 and that plaintiff has not published said manuscript, nor has she permitted any person or corporation to publish said work in book, dramatic, or any other form. During 1948 she contacted defendant Ben Medford, a writer’s agent in Beverly Hills, and relinquished the manuscript to him upon his promise to submit it for revision to defendant Max Catto, a writer. On several occasions thereafter Medford informed her that he has having no success in selling the manuscript to a studio. In 1950 a book titled “The Killing Prost,” written by defendant Catto, was published by Heinman Company in London. That book was written, published, and sold without plaintiff’s consent and in infringement of her common law property rights. That book was copied largely from plaintiff’s manuscript. Thereafter a “movie” was produced by defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.