Pease

Pease v. City of San Diego

Good Law
1949 Cal. App. LEXIS 1391·93 Cal. App. 2d 386·208 P.2d 1044
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 18, 1949Civ. 3944California1,440 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnard, J.

This is an action for declaratory relief for the purpose of determining the validity of a lease.

On August 2, 1926, the State Board of Harbor Commissioners leased certain tidelands in Mission Bay to the plaintiff for 50 years for a rental of $30 per month, together with 5 per cent of all gross income from the leased premises. The lease also required the plaintiff to expend, or cause to be expended, $10,000 within 10 years from the date of the lease, in making improvements upon the leased premises. It further provided that “said improvements” should consist of dredging upon said lands or in the area in front of, around or surrounding the same; in the construction of various things including canals, waterways, streets and sidewalks; or in “all facilities necessary or required for residences or club house, places or purposes in, upon, through, over and adjoining said leased property.” It was then provided that if the parties were unable to agree upon the amounts or values of any such improvements during the period prescribed, such amounts or values should be determined by arbitration in the manner therein provided.

During the pendency of the Mattoon assessment situation the rentals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.