Straughter

Straughter v. Safety Savings & Loan Assn.

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1556·244 Cal. App. 2d 159·52 Cal. Rptr. 871
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 11, 1966Civ. 29698California1,952 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wood, J.

After a demurrer of defendant Safety Savings and Loan Association, and defendant Woods, to the first amended complaint had been sustained on all the grounds specified in the demurrer, plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time allowed for amending, and an order of dismissal was entered as to said defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the order.

Appellant contends that the first amended complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that the allegations therein are not uncertain or ambiguous.

The allegations of the first amended complaint are in substance, as follows: At all times mentioned, plaintiff was a licensed real estate broker. Between July 1, 1959, and July 1, 1963, defendants without the knowledge or consent of plaintiff, used plaintiff’s said license and conspired and connived to collect, and collected, commissions for obtaining loans and securing deposits for defendants; and defendants concealed from plaintiff the amount of commissions so collected. Defendants, in carrying out such conspiracy, would list plaintiff as the broker for securing the loans and deposits, would collect the commissions in plaintiff’s name, and would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.