Romero

People v. Romero

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1599·244 Cal. App. 2d 495·53 Cal. Rptr. 260
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 1966Crim. 5260California4,553 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment which sentenced him to imprisonment following his conviction by jury verdict of burglary in violation of section 459 of the Penal Code, which by stipulation, was fixed as of the second degree. He also was charged with an admitted four prior felony convictions.

On his appeal he asserts the following errors: (1) the receipt of evidence of “prior convictions’’ in the prosecution's case in chief; (2) the receipt of evidence of a blood test to prove that defendant was not intoxicated at the time of the alleged burglary; (3) comment by the prosecution on the defendant’s failure to testify; and (4) failure to properly arraign the defendant for judgment.

An examination of the record reflects that evidence of other offenses was properly received for the light it shed on defendant’s intent, method of operation, knowledge and plan; and that there was no prejudicial error in the other particulars advanced by defendant.

The facts are brief and not in dispute. On March 7, 1965, at 1 o’clock in the morning, officers of the San Jose Police Department apprehended the defendant in Clancy’s Restaurant and arrested him for the crime of burglary. The officers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.