Doyle

Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1602·244 Cal. App. 2d 521·53 Cal. Rptr. 420
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 1966Civ. 11094California1,842 words

Opinion

Opinion

Friedman, J.

After an administrative hearing the Board of Barber Examiners ordered revocation of petitioner’s barbershop certificate. He sought review by mandate in the superior court and now appeals from a judgment sustaining the board’s action.

Petitioner held a barbershop certificate for premises at 1129 20th Street in the City of Sacramento as well as a certificate as a journeyman barber. Following the filing and service of the administrative accusation, petitioner received notice of a hearing before a hearing officer. He chose not to file a notice of defense as permitted by Government Code sections 11505 and 11506. He did appear at the hearing and submitted evidence on his own behalf. The hearing officer and the Board of Barber Examiners found (1) that on November 27, 1963, between 11 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. petitioner had working in his barbershop two apprentice barbers and one journeyman barber, in violation of Business and Professions Code section 6550; (2) that on the same day petitioner violated section 6604 of the same code by having open connecting doors between his barbershop and a connecting barbershop.

The barbershop at 1129 20th Street appears to be in a building at a street…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.