Sunru Chang v. Carson Estate Co.

Good Law
168 Cal. App. 2d 110
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 1959Civ. No. 23185California2,261 words

Opinion

Opinion

This is an appeal by defendant from an order made under section 473, Code of Civil Procedure, setting aside a judgment of dismissal and permitting plaintiff to file a third amended complaint. [fn. 1]

On September 18, 1957, the court sustained defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's second amended complaint and gave 10 days in which to file an amended complaint. On that same date a substitution of attorneys was executed by which plaintiff undertook to represent herself. No amended complaint having been filed in the time allowed, counsel for defendant served notice (together with an affidavit and points and authorities) that on November 7, 1957, he would make a motion to dismiss the action. Plaintiff thereupon employed Ven O. Fahrney, Esq., to represent her, and delivered to him the notice of motion and papers in relation thereto. Fahrney arranged with counsel for defendant for a continuance of one week with the understanding that the latter would appear on the 7th and make necessary arrangements with the court for the continuance. Fahrney relied on this arrangement and was not present on November 7 for the hearing. Upon returning to his office on November 12 Fahrney had a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.