United States v. Silvino Florez-Valerio
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 201110-30342California255 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 18 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30342
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00029-DWM
v.
MEMORANDUM *
SILVINO FLOREZ-VALERIO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2011 **
Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
Silvino Florez-Valerio appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon
revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Florez-Valerio contends the district court procedurally erred by failing to
adequately explain its decision that the sentence run consecutively to his sentence
for the underlying crime that…