United States v. Silvino Florez-Valerio

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 201110-30342California255 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 18 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30342

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00029-DWM

v.

MEMORANDUM *

SILVINO FLOREZ-VALERIO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2011 **

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Silvino Florez-Valerio appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Florez-Valerio contends the district court procedurally erred by failing to

adequately explain its decision that the sentence run consecutively to his sentence

for the underlying crime that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.