Tampico

Tampico v. Wood

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 1648·222 Cal. App. 2d 211·34 Cal. Rptr. 885
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 12, 1963Civ. 26878California1,683 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fox, J.

Plaintiffs Joseph and Berenice Tampico brought this action for rescission of an agreement for the purchase of certain real property and for damages against defendants Thelma and Ernest Wood, the sellers, and defendant Beck, a real estate broker. At a previous trial judgment was entered for defendants Wood against the plaintiffs, and for the plaintiffs against defendant Beck for damages. On appeal the judgment was reversed. On a retrial the court ordered the cancellation of certain notes and trust deeds executed by the plaintiffs and gave plaintiffs a substantial judgment against Beck. Plaintiffs on this judgment roll appeal seek additional relief against defendants Wood.

The facts, as found by the trial court, are that Beck, a licensed real estate broker, went to the home of plaintiffs on May 19, 1958, and interested them, as an investment opportunity, in purchasing the Woods’ trailer court property in Pasadena. Beck made misrepresentations concerning the property upon which the plaintiffs relied. The same evening the plaintiffs accompanied Beck to the property, inspected the area, then returned home and signed a deposit receipt and gave Beck a check for $7,500, payable to him,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.