Blaylock

People v. Blaylock

Good Law
1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1394·233 Cal. App. 2d 603·43 Cal. Rptr. 846
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 15, 1965Crim. 120California1,118 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

Trial by jury having been waived, the court found the defendant guilty of murder of the second degree. Judgment was entered accordingly, from which the defendant appeals.

The controlling contention made by the defendant on this appeal is that incriminating statements and confessions were improperly admitted at the trial because he was not informed of his right to aid of counsel and of his right to remain silent prior to the time the confessions were made by him. We have concluded that the contention is sound and admission of the statements and confessions constituted reversible error.

About 11 p.m. on January 6, 1964, one Robert Hoyopatubbi met his death when the defendant fired three bullets from a gun into Robert’s head, one of which did its deadly work. Death occurred in the bedroom of a home situated in Modesto, California. Present in the room at the time were the defendant, one Patricia Waldo (referred to in the record as Patricia Hoyopatubbi), and Robert. Patricia and the defendant went to the home of a neighbor, Mrs. Elsie Tyler, who telephoned the sheriff’s office. Carl Costley, a deputy sheriff, responding to the call, arrived at the Tyler home about 11:33 p.m. Costley…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.