Schiffner

Schiffner v. Pappas

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 1564·223 Cal. App. 2d 526·35 Cal. Rptr. 817
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 1963Civ. 10670California919 words

Opinion

Opinion

Friedman, J.

Appellants (whom we shall refer to collectively as “Pappas”) filed a notice of appeal from adverse judgments in superior court actions No. 13028 and No. 13046. These actions had been consolidated for trial. Pappas’ brief on appeal attacks only the judgment in No. 13046. We regard the appeal from the judgment in No. 13028 as having been abandoned, and the appeal in that action is dismissed.

Pappas entered into a contract with respondents (referred to herein as “the Schiffners”) to purchase a sawmill on deferred installment payments; to buy timber rights and to engage the Schiffners to log the timber purchased. The contract provided that on Wednesday of each week, Pappas would pay the Schiffners for all logs delivered and logging services performed during the preceding calendar week at specified rates per thousand board feet. The contract provided that default in any payment would give the Schiffners an option to terminate the entire contract unless Pappas elected to perform within 30 days after the Schiffners gave notice of default. The contract contained no provision for interest on tardy payments.

On Wednesday, September 27, 1961, Pappas failed to pay the Schiffners $17,538.40,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.