Brunt

Brunt v. Occidental Life Insurance

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 1513·223 Cal. App. 2d 179·35 Cal. Rptr. 492
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 10, 1963Civ. 27322California2,579 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lillie, J.

Plaintiff sought a declaratory decree that defendant be held liable under a sickness and accident insurance policy for which he applied on August 21, 1961. At that time he tendered the sum of $5.46 and was given a receipt therefor, made subject to certain conditions. Eight days later, before the policy issued, he sustained a broken pelvis when he fell down a flight of steps. Judgment was for plaintiff after trial on a written stipulation of facts, and defendant has appealed. The single problem presented is whether the conditional receipt given to plaintiff created a contract of interim insurance pending acceptance of the application or approval of the risk.

Plaintiff has not filed a brief on appeal. His trial counsel, by letter, state that their client is an indigent and without funds to finance an appearance in this court; they further state that plaintiff’s actual pecuniary interest in the outcome of the instant litigation is so small that he would never consider expending the sums required. Without wishing to censure counsel, sometimes the economies of the situation must yield to the truism that, “ [lit is as much the duty of the respondent to assist the court upon the appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.