Wilson

Wilson v. Rancho Sespe

Good Law
207 Cal. App. 2d 10·24 Cal. Rptr. 296
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 1962Civ. 25727California5,506 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wood, J.

These two actions, for damages (to ranch property) resulting from fire, were consolidated for trial. Plaintiffs Wilson, in the first action, are owners of a ranch which is near the ranch known as ' ‘ Rancho Sespe, ’ ’ on which the fire started. Each of the other plaintiffs in that action (Beekman and Pagenkopp) also owns a ranch which is near the Sespe ranch. Plaintiffs Richard and Jacqueline Hardison, in the second action, also own such a nearby ranch; and the other plaintiffs therein (Leigh and Myrtle Hardison) own a nearby ranch. Stated in another way, five ranches, each of which is owned individually by a plaintiff or is owned jointly by two plaintiffs, are near the Sespe ranch where the fire started.

The defendants, other than Rancho Sespe, were Mr. Clark-son and his three employees (Arguelles, Cook, and Ferguson) who, prior to the fire, had blasted boulders which were on the Sespe ranch.

In a jury trial the verdict in each action was against defendant Rancho Sespe, a corporation. Judgments, in accordance with the verdicts, were entered. Defendant Rancho Sespe appeals from the judgments.

Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdicts; and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.