Ramirez

Ramirez v. Mookini

Good Law
1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 1880·207 Cal. App. 2d 42·24 Cal. Rptr. 354
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 1962Civ. 6732California4,010 words

Opinion

Opinion

Griffin, J.

Plaintiffs, respondents and appellants, Higino Ramirez and wife (hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs), brought this action to quiet title to certain real property and for damages against defendants and appellants Dewey K. Mookini and wife (hereinafter referred to as defendants Mookini). Damages are sought by plaintiffs against defendant and respondent Ralph B. Nunnelley (hereinafter referred to as defendant Nunnelley). The complaint alleges generally that plaintiffs now are and for a long time hitherto have been the owners and in possession of certain real property in San Diego County described as:

They allege that defendants claim an interest therein adverse to plaintiffs. The second cause of action alleges that plaintiffs have an easement over the described real property for the purpose of maintaining thereon the overriding corner of a building, the main portion of which is situated upon lot No. 21 which adjoins it, for the purpose of providing reasonable access to and about said building; that said building existed for many years prior to the purchase of lot No. 22 by defendants Mookini and was acquired by them with full knowledge of the existence of said building and notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.