Moreno

Moreno v. Mihelis

Good Law
1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 1928·207 Cal. App. 2d 449·24 Cal. Rptr. 582
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 1962Civ. 140California821 words

Opinion

Opinion

Conley, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Pericles Mihelis, from an order of the superior court granting his motion to quash the writ of execution issued in the case only on condition that he dismiss his appeal from the judgment.

On the present appeal the respondent failed to file a brief within 30 days after service upon him of appellant’s opening brief (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 16(a) ). Pursuant to the provisions of California Rules of Court, rule 17(b), the clerk of this court thereupon notified the parties by mail that the case would be submitted for decision on the record and on the appellant’s opening brief unless respondent filed a brief within 30 days after the date of mailing or showed good cause for relief. The 30-day period having passed, and no brief or application for relief from default having been filed by respondent, notification was given both parties by the clerk that the cause would be ordered submitted unless appellant requested oral argument. Appellant’s counsel advised the court that he did not wish to argue the cause; the ease was ordered submitted.

Under the Rules on Appeal this court has the right to accept as true the statement of facts in appellant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.