Kabal Singh v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
445 F. App'x 22
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 201108-72866California299 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Kabal Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Singh v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1139, 1143 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Singh claimed in his testimony and application that he was arrested after participating in a rally commemorating the 1984 attack on the Golden Temple, and that he gave a speech against the Golden Temple killings. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination because Singh admitted that during his interview with an asylum officer, he lacked knowledge about the Golden Temple attack. See id. at 1142-43 (adverse credibility finding supported based, in part, on “how little knowledge [the petitioner] had of political activities in India”). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination because Singh testified inconsistently regarding the circumstances of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.