Southern Pacific Co. v. Seaboard Mills

Good Law
1962 Cal. App. LEXIS 1886·207 Cal. App. 2d 97·24 Cal. Rptr. 236
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 23, 1962Docket Nos. 25926, 25928, 25929, 25927California3,061 words

Opinion

Opinion

Herndon, J.

These are appeals by plaintiff in four separate actions from orders and judgments of dismissal made on motion pursuant to section 583, Code of Civil Procedure, and from an order denying a motion to vacate the judgments. The record in each is limited to the clerk’s transcript. Each of the actions is based on a claim by appellant for money allegedly refunded in error to respondents. The controversies appear to have arisen as a result of the application to certain goods shipped by respondents over the rail lines of plaintiff of tariff classifications different from those which had been contemplated. The issues of fact and law are substantially identical in each action. A detailed statement of the alleged facts is contained in Southern Pac. Co. v. Fish, 166 Cal.App.2d 353 [ 333 P.2d 133 ], which reversed a summary judgment previously granted in each of the actions.

The clerk’s transcripts reflect that the suits were commenced by the filing of the complaints and issuance of summonses on the following dates: No. 25926, August 20, 1951; No. 25927, October 19, 1951; No. 25928, November 15, 1951; No. 25929, May 27, 1952. For various reasons not material to our decision, no action was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.