Shaffer

Shaffer v. Security Trust & Savings Bank

Good Law
1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 509·4 Cal. App. 2d 707·41 P.2d 948
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 1935Civ. 1133California3,339 words

Opinion

Opinion

Marks, J.

Plaintiffs secured judgment against defendant in the sum of $3,747.20, being the total sum paid under the terms of an executory contract for the sale of real property between defendant and Maria Meisrimel Lapham, now deceased. This judgment is now before us for review.

The following grounds for a reversal of the judgment are presented: (1) The evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the judgment as it does not show that Mrs. Lapham was of unsound mind at the time she executed the contract. (2) A notice of rescission was necessary. The individual plaintiffs gave none. The notice given by the executor was ineffective as it was given without authority either of law or the probate court. (3) The agreement to purchase the real property was part of a concurrent agreement to make a loan and plaintiffs could not rescind the purchase and retain the benefits of the loan. (4) Since no money was paid by Mrs. Lapham, who gave a note secured by a mortgage, a money judgment was improper. (5) Plaintiffs ratified the agreement of purchase. (6) Plaintiffs lost the right of rescission through laches. (7) Money judgment, if any, should have been against defendant as trustee. (8)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.