Gallichotte

Gallichotte v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n

Good Law
1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 459·4 Cal. App. 2d 503·41 P.2d 349
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 1935Civ. 9390California2,168 words

Opinion

Opinion

Held, J.

The plaintiff and appellant, the owner of an automobile, certain household furniture, and also of miscellaneous painter’s equipment, supplies and apparatus, insured such property against loss by fire. Subsequently, the insured property was in part destroyed by fire, and the insurers paid to plaintiff the loss thereby occasioned to him. Following sufficient assignments, this action was instituted by plaintiff to recover on behalf of the insurers the amount paid plaintiff under the several policies covering the property destroyed. The plaintiff is the owner of .a lot in the city of San Jose, on which lot was situated a dwelling house, garage and paint shop. The property destroyed by fire was contained in these several buildings. The defendant California Mutual Building & Loan Associa tion, a corporation, at the time of the fire referred to was the owner of a vacant lot situated to the southwest of and adjoining plaintiff’s property. The defendants Howard and Pilgram were employees of the California Mutual Building & Loan Association, and on June 9, 1932, were assigned by their employer to the task of burning the weeds growing on the vacant lot of the defendant association. While…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.