Distefano

Distefano v. Hall

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 1829·218 Cal. App. 2d 657·32 Cal. Rptr. 770
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 26, 1963Civ. 19502California10,542 words

Opinion

Opinion

Molinari, J.

All of the parties to this litigation have appealed from the judgment in an action brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. In essence, there: are three ■ appeals * by plaintiff; by defendants Charles W.'Hall and Dorothea Fabian (hereinafter referred to as Hall); and by defendants Carl L. Dozier and Winifred Dozier (hereinafter referred to as Dozier).

Statement of the Case.

Plaintiff filed an action against Hall -and Dozier for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien upon certain real property. The complaint alleges that plaintiff, as a licensed general contractor, entered into a written contract with Hall and Dozier to furnish and deliver materials and perform labor in the construction of an apartment. house building; that he furnished labor and materials in the construction thereof to the value of $158,458.05, of which only $30,000 was paid, leaving a- balance due in the sum of $128,458.05; that said agreement provided for the payment of reasonable attorney’s fees in the event suit was brought to enforce its terms; that the sum of $5,000 is a reasonable attorney’s fee - and that a claim of lien was duly and timely recorded.

Dozier answered by way of general denial. Hall also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.