Crouch

People v. Crouch

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 1760·218 Cal. App. 2d 157·32 Cal. Rptr. 141
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 11, 1963Crim. 4337California1,336 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sullivan, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of violating section 288a of the Penal Code rendered by the court sitting without a jury. The sole ques tion presented here is whether the defendant property waived a trial by jury. We have concluded that he did not.

The record shows that when the case was called for trial on June 26, 1962, the prospective members of the jury were present in the courtroom. It also indicates that there had been some previous discussion among counsel and the judge in regard to a jury. After the roll of the prospective jurors was called by the clerk the following occurred: ‘ ‘ The Court: We will take that up later, Madam Clerk. Now, gentlemen of counsel, the district attorney and counsel for the defendant, I understand at this time you have a communication to address to the Court that will dispense with, perhaps, the members of the panel subpoenaed for jury service this morning. Mr. Bassett: May I be heard, Your Honor? The Court: The Court recognizes Mr. Bassett, counsel for the defendant. Mr. Bassett : May it please the Court, the defendant will stipulated [sic] with the prosecution attorney, if he is agreeable, that the jury may be dispensed with and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.