McReynolds v. McReynolds

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 1830·218 Cal. App. 2d 683·32 Cal. Rptr. 462
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 26, 1963Civ. 26922California2,496 words

Opinion

Opinion

Herndon, J.

Plaintiff wife appeals from an order denying her application for modification of the provisions of the interlocutory and final judgments of divorce relating to the payments required of defendant for the support of the minor son of the parties, who was born on September 13,1945. Appellant also complains of that portion of the order which, although it denies the husband’s request for a change in that portion of the judgment awarding custody of the child to appellant, requires appellant to provide the child with certain psychotherapy treatments without any specific provision as to which of the parties is to bear the cost thereof.

Appellant was granted an interlocutory judgment of divorce on August 1, 1949, and a final judgment of divorce on November 1, 1950. Although appellant was given custody of the minor child, neither judgment makes any provision for support payments either for appellant or for said child. The interlocutory judgment provides that “the Separation Agreement between the parties dated June 30, 1949, is ordered to be filed as plaintiff’s Exhibit ‘1,’ ” but the terms and conditions thereof are neither approved, ordered complied with, nor even referred to, in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.