Stilley

Truck Insurance Exchange v. Stilley

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2730·213 Cal. App. 2d 311·28 Cal. Rptr. 588
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 1963Civ. 26469; Civ. 26470California5,175 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wood, J.

Three actions for damages, arising from a traffic accident involving three trucks, were consolidated for trial.

In the first action, Truck Insurance Exchange (the compensation insurance carrier for Kenworthy-Norton Trucking Company, the employer of James B. Anderson who is a driver involved herein) sued Walter J. Hanrahan (driver) and his employer Dave Martin Trucking Corporation, and Samuel W. Stilley (driver) and his employer Time Truck Lines (T.I.M.E. Incorporated).

In the second action, Walter J. Hanrahan and his employer Dave Martin Trucking Corporation sued James B. Anderson and his employer Kenworthy-Norton Trucking Company.

In the third action, James B. Anderson sued Stilley and his employer Time Truck Lines.

In the first action the verdict was in favor of defendants Dave Martin Trucking and Hanrahan, and was for the plaintiffs Truck Insurance Exchange and against Time Truck Lines and Stilley. The motion of defendants Time Truck Lines and Stilley for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted, and such judgment was entered.

In the second action the verdict was for the plaintiffs Hanrahan and Dave Martin Trucking and against defendants Anderson and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.