Lingsch

Lingsch v. Savage

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2794·213 Cal. App. 2d 729·29 Cal. Rptr. 201·8 A.L.R. 3d 537
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 1963Civ. 20749California4,872 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sullivan, J.

In this action for damages for fraud brought against the sellers of certain real property and the real estate broker representing them, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for the defendant broker entered after the sustaining of his demurrer without leave to amend.

The complaint filed February 13, 1962, alleges in substance as follows: That plaintiffs are and, at all times since July 10, 1961, were the owners of certain real property located in San Francisco; that prior to plaintiffs’ acquisition thereof the defendants Nicholas Kotoff, Nell Kotoff and certain fictitious defendants were the owners, and the defendant Savage, a real estate broker, represented said owners; and that “said defendants entered into a uniform agreement of sale and deposit receipt, a copy of which is hereto attached as Exhibit 1, on the dates therein referred to, and that the consideration as indicated therein was fully paid.”

It is further alleged: that at the time of the sale, the “defendants and each of them specifically knew that the building was in a state of disrepair, and that units contained therein were illegal and that the building had been placed for condemnation by the proper officials” of San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.