Cannon

Meyer Koulish Co. v. Cannon

Caution
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2746·213 Cal. App. 2d 419·28 Cal. Rptr. 757
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 1963Civ. 26315California4,855 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ashburn, J.

Defendants Cannon-Schaefer Agency, a copartnership, and Fred J. Cannon, one of the partners, appeal from summary judgment rendered against them in favor of plaintiffs Meyer Koulish Co., Inc., and Arthur Nass, respectively.

Defendants were manufacturers’ agents. Plaintiffs separately shipped certain jewelry from New York to Los Angeles on consignment to defendant Cannon-Schaefer Agency and both defendants are charged with and admit receipt of the jewelry upon and pursuant to the terms and provisions of consignment memoranda sent them by plaintiffs. These memoranda place the risk of loss from all hazards upon defendants until the return of the jewelry to plaintiffs. On March 4, 1957, while Mr. Cannon was on a sales trip, his trunk which contained the consigned jewelry was stolen from the baggage room of the Southern Pacific station at Tucson, Arizona, while the trunk was still checked on the railroad claim ticket. The theft was not due to any fault or negligence on the part of Cannon.

The complaint alleged three causes of action on behalf of each plaintiff. The first cause of action was for breach of contract, based upon the memoranda. The second cause of action was based on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.