Estate of Miller

Good Law
259 Cal. App. 2d 536·66 Cal. Rptr. 756
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 1968Civ. Nos. 691, 834California6,805 words

Opinion

Opinion

For the third time, this court has been called upon in these consolidated appeals to pass upon issues of the litigation in the above estate. Reference is made to the two earlier opinions in Estate of Miller, 212 Cal.App.2d 284 [ 27 Cal.Rptr. 909 ] and Estate of Miller, 230 Cal.App.2d 888 [ 41 Cal.Rptr. 410 ].

No move for a hearing by the Supreme Court was made in the first case; but, in the latter instance, application was made for a hearing in the Supreme Court, which was denied on January 20, 1965. Thereafter, in due course, the remittitur in each case was issued to the Tulare County Superior Court, where the appellant, Miriam Miller Hartman, acting in timely fashion, filed cost bills as to each, neither judgment of which has ever been completed by that court, or paid. Numerous additional proceedings, however, have since been carried on in the Tulare County Superior Court, both in connection with the probate estate and the trust, and appeals were taken by Mrs. Hartman as to various matters in both. Several of these appeals resulted in two of the numbered proceedings with which we are here concerned, 5 Civil Nos. 691 and 834, which, by stipulation, were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.