Kramer
People v. Kramer
Opinion
Opinion
Tamura, J.
Following a jury trial defendant was found guilty of abortion, his motion for a new trial was denied, proceedings were suspended and he was granted probation. Defendant appeals front the order granting probation and also'purports'"to appeal from a “judgment of conviction’’ •and. an order denying new trial. A judgment of conviction not having been entered and an order denying a new trial being nonappealable in the present case, the purported appeals therefrom must be dismissed. (People v. King, 60 Cal.2d 308, 309 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 825 , 384 P.2d 153 ]; People v. Jones, 36 Cal.2d 373, 375 [ 224 P.2d 353 ].)
One of defendant’s contentions on this appeal being insufficiency of the evidence to. support the conviction, including a claimed absence of sufficient evidence corroborating the testimony of the prosecutrix, we shall review the evidence in some detail, viewing it, as we must, in the light most favorable to respondent.
In the latter part of 1964 and early 1965 the prosecutrix, who on the date of the alleged offense had just turned 18 and was separated from her husband, resided in Garden Grove in Orange County with one Mary Jean Stark. In early January 1965 prosecutrix missed her…