Reimel

Reimel v. House

Good Law
1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 1994·259 Cal. App. 2d 511·66 Cal. Rptr. 434
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 1968Civ. 30427California1,905 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fourt, J.

This is an appeal by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Department) through its director, James 0. Reimel, from a judgment of the trial court denying a petition for a writ of mandate (and discharging an alternative writ of mandate), which would have required the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Board), to affirm the decision made by the Department.

Westside Liquor Company (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Westside), doing business as Kazan’s Wines and Spirits, holds an off-sale general liquor license issued by the Department. On December 13, 1963, the Department filed an accusation against Westside in which it was alleged in separate counts that on each of three occasions (November 15, 18, and 22, 1963, respectively) Westside violated the Fair Trade Laws (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 24755) by making retail sales of alcoholic beverages at prices below the effective minimum retail prices. A hearing on these charges was conducted before a hearing officer from the Office of Administrative Procedure, who issued a proposed decision finding the accusations true.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.