Taliaferro

Taliaferro v. Davis

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2094·216 Cal. App. 2d 860·31 Cal. Rptr. 443
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 6, 1963Civ. 19954California1,193 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sullivan, J.

The instant action of interpleader was originally filed in the municipal court and, upon the filing of two cross-complaints seeking relief beyond the jurisdiction of said court, was transferred to the court below. We are concerned here only with the “cross-complaint to determine adverse claims” filed against the cross-defendant Davis, respondent herein, and others, which set forth two separately stated causes of action and sought a declaration of the rights of the parties in respect to certain real property and also a judgment quieting the cross-complainant’s title thereto.

Following is a chronology of the procedural events pertinent here: On June 27, 1960, the cause was transferred to and filed in the court below; on August 2, 1960, respondent’s default was entered; on August 3, 1960, after a hearing, the matter was submitted on the cross-complaint; and, on October 27,1960, the court filed its memorandum decision, stating that appellant was entitled to certain relief and directing him to prepare a judgment in accordance with the views therein expressed. On November 4, 1960, respondent filed her “Notice of Motion for Order Setting Aside Default and Any Judgment Entered Thereon.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.