Bowen

Bowen v. Cowett

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2079·216 Cal. App. 2d 766·31 Cal. Rptr. 184
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 1963Civ. 7055California1,163 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

Plaintiffs, Colonel L. Bowen and his wife, sued defendant, Daniel J. Cowett, an attorney, for malpractice and breach of contract by reason of his failure to carry out his employment of August 18, 1959, to move to set aside a judgment entered against the plaintiffs on March 13, 1959, in another action. The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment of dismissal following a summary judgment favoring defendant.

The background of the action is as follows: One Addie M. Hicks obtained a judgment against Boy B. Bansom and Ceeile Bansom (hereinafter called Bansom) on August 10, 1956, in action No. 81748 in the San Bernardino County Superior Court. On June 7, 1956, Bansom deeded certain real property to Quinon D. Wallace and Bose Mary Wallace (hereinafter called Wallace) who thereafter deeded the same property to the appellants herein. Later, in action No. 88813 in the San Bernardino County Superior Court, Hicks sued to set aside as fraudulent the conveyances from Bansom to Wallace and from Wallace to appellants. The appellants appeared through an attorney of record; they had notice of trial, and when the action was called for trial January 26, 1959, the appellants herein appeared in court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.