Diowchi

Diowchi v. Superior Court

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2048·216 Cal. App. 2d 525·31 Cal. Rptr. 214
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 1963Civ. 27159California1,104 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kingsley, J.

Petitioner is the assignee for collection of a firm of attorneys. These attorneys (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Beilensons”) were retained by the real party in interest to represent her in a divorce action. During the pendency of that action, respondent court made and entered its order directing the husband to pay directly to them the sum of $7,500 on account of attorney fees and $4,000 on account of costs. This order was secured by a lien, in favor of wife, on certain real and personal property. The husband duly appealed from this order (although it appears from the petition that $5,000 has been paid in partial satisfaction thereof) and that appeal is now pending in division three of this court (2d Civ. 27245). Thereafter, according to the petition, Beilensons filed in the divorce action a notice of motion for $13,000 additional fees. Before this motion came on forbearing, the wife purported to discharge Beilensons as her attorneys and moved to effect a substitution of new counsel. Both the motion of Beilensons for additional fees and the motion to substitute attorneys were continued, on motion of the husband, and are still pending in respondent court, subject to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.