Ralph C. Sutro Co. v. Paramount Plastering, Inc.

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2034·216 Cal. App. 2d 433·31 Cal. Rptr. 174
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 21, 1963Civ. 26312California1,475 words

Opinion

Opinion

Shinn, J.

Plaintiff, Ralph C. Sutro Company, brought suit in interpleader. The interpleaded fund of $10,910.39 represents the balance of moneys held by plaintiff pursuant to a construction loan agreement between plaintiff and Hindry Properties, Inc. Western Investment and Title Company (Witco), claims the interpleaded fund under contractual rights and is opposed by the remainder of the defendants, respondents herein, all of whom rendered services or delivered materials on behalf of said construction. The trial court, after deducting Sutro’s costs and attorney’s fees, ordered the fund distributed on a pro rata basis to respondents. Witco appeals.

The facts pertinent to a decision herein are as follows: On November 15, 1957, plaintiff, Sutro Cq., entered into a loan agreement with Hindry Properties, Inc., whereby Hindry as the owner of certain property was to borrow $60,000 from or through Sutro for the construction of a 15-unit two-story apartment building thereon. The loan agreement further provided that the loan proceeds were to be used exclusively for the express purpose of paying bills and claims for labor and materials with respect to the construction. On the same date Hindry…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.