Kitchel

Kitchel v. Acree

Bad Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 1995·216 Cal. App. 2d 119·30 Cal. Rptr. 714
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 1963Civ. 20801California2,607 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sullivan, J.

In this action on a building contract, plaintiffs and cross-defendants (hereinafter called appellants) appeal from a judgment, after a nonjury trial, which with one minor exception denies them recovery on their complaint and' awards defendants • and cross-complainants (hereinafter called respondents) the sum of $1,750 on their cross-complaint together with costs of suit and other relief.

Appellants, who are building contractors, entered into a contract- with respondents to construct a house on respondents’ real property. On November 25, 1959, appellants filed a complaint for foreclosure, seeking the recovery of $11,384 alleged as the balance due and unpaid on said contract, reasonable attorney’s fees, and the foreclosure of their contractor’s lien theretofore filed against respondents’ property. Respondents did -not file; their answer and cross-complaint until September 21, 1960. In the meantime, pursuant to a written agreement between the parties, the respondent paid appel lants an additional $9,000 on the general understanding that such payment would be without prejudice to the respective claims of the parties.

Eespondents in their answer alleged that an additional $9,000 had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.