Esswein

Esswein v. Rogers

Good Law
1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 1991·216 Cal. App. 2d 91·30 Cal. Rptr. 738
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 1963Civ. 26595California1,941 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bishop, J.

The sum of $10,000, one-half of that paid to the defendant under an insurance policy on the life of his one-time partner, is the main stake in this action. For several years preceding his death, Frank L. Esswein and the defendant were partners operating under the name of E & R Machine and Mfg. Co. The plaintiff, the widow and executrix of the will of Frank L. Esswein, claiming that the $20,000 received by the defendant was a part of the assets of the partnership, sought an accounting. The defendant filed a cross-complaint, asking for a declaratory judgment decreeing that he held the entire proceeds from the insurance policy as his own, and not as a partnership asset. The trial court entered a judgment for the cross-complainant and we are affirming it.

As we read appellant’s earnest argument on this appeal, we discover three main premises: (1) under an insurance policy, in which the owner retains the right to change the named beneficiary, the beneficiary named has not a vested but only a contingent interest; (2) an assignment of the policy gives the assignee the right, superior to that of the beneficiary, to the proceeds of the policy; and (3) the assignment extinguishes the right…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.