Holtzendorff

Holtzendorff v. Housing Authority

Good Law
1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 2144·250 Cal. App. 2d 596·58 Cal. Rptr. 886
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 1, 1967Civ. 29865; Civ. 29866California12,926 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fox, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the wrongful discharge of plaintiffs under their respective employment contracts with defendant. Holtzendorff was awarded $122,661 and Miss Rosien $85,538. Defendant has appealed.

Under its cross-complaint against Holtzendorff, defendant Housing Authority sought to recover money that it had paid to Holtzendorff to reimburse him for attorney fees and expenses in connection with certain criminal proceedings taken against him that grew out of his political involvement with defendant. Judgment was rendered in favor of the Housing Authority for $36,537.17 plus interest making the total amount of the judgment on the cross-complaint $38,442.16. Holtzendorff has appealed.

The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles is a public corporation created pursuant to the Housing Authorities Law of the Health and Safety Code of this state (§ 34200 et seq.) which was enacted by the Legislature to qualify local housing bodies for federal loans under the United States Housing Act of 1937. ( 42 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq.) The Authority operates by and through five appointed commissioners who serve for staggered terms without compensation pursuant to section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.