Alperson

Alperson v. Mirisch Co.

Good Law
1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 2081·250 Cal. App. 2d 84·58 Cal. Rptr. 178
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 13, 1967Civ. 30055California3,865 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lillie, J.

The controversy herein resulting in a declaratory relief action arose out of different constructions given by the parties to certain written agreements dealing with the then proposed motion picture photoplay Irma La Douce. Plaintiff Alperson had negotiated with others for the acquisition of motion picture and television rights to the play; under the first agreement between the parties dated June 29, 1960, Mirisch contracted to pay Alperson therefor a sum equal to 25 percent of 100 percent of the net profits to be derived from the distribution and exploitation of the photoplay, it being specifically provided that Alperson’s share of profits should not be reduced by any shares of profits paid by Mirisch to any third person. The agreement defined net profits as gross receipts (as defined in applicable distribution agreements) less the aggregate of distribution fees and expenses, interest on production loans, other expenses not here material and “the cost of production of the picture. ’ ’ Included within the definition of production costs are “all sums paid pursuant to percentage of gross receipts agreements.” In February of 1961 Mirisch entered into an agreement with Pyramid…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.