Trumbo

Trumbo v. Crestline Lake Arrowhead Water Agency

Good Law
1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 2111·250 Cal. App. 2d 320·58 Cal. Rptr. 538
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 21, 1967Civ. 8324California2,700 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tamura, J.

The Crestline-Lake Arrowhead Water Agency is a public entity created by a special act of the Legislature (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) and activated by a vote of the qualified electors. At a bond election held on June 15, 1965, the voters authorized the agency to issue general obligation bonds totalling seven and one-half million dollars. Petitioners, who are residents, property owners, and qualified voters within the agency, sought a writ of mandate in the superior court challenging both the procedural validity of the bond election, as well as the substantive power of the agency to incur a bonded indebtedness in an amount which they allege would require revenues in excess of that which could be raised by the maximum tax rate of $1.00 per $100 assessed valuation in order to service the bonds. A general demurrer to the amended petition was sustained without leave to amend, and judgment was entered dismissing the petition. Petitioners appeal from the judgment.

The Act provides for a maximum tax rate of $1.00 per $100 assessed valuation subject to an increase by a vote of the electors. Originally no provision was made for a standby water charge, but in 1965 the Legislature…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.