Maner

Maner v. Mydland

Good Law
1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 2134·250 Cal. App. 2d 526·58 Cal. Rptr. 740
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 1967Civ. 30324California3,870 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fox, J.

Plaintiffs seek to recover their investment in a stock promotion. Judgment was rendered in favor of Maner and Tepper, but in favor of defendants and against Bennett. Defendants made a motion for a new trial which was granted as to defendant Mydland but denied as to Jones and Lindsey. Maner and Tepper have appealed from the order granting Mydland a new trial, and Mydland has cross-appealed from the judgment in favor of Maner and Tepper. Bennett has appealed from the judgment in favor of defendant in his case.

In April 1961 defendants organized the A.V.T.A. Corporation (known as A VTA Corporation) for the manufacture, sale and distribution of audio-visual teaching aids. It had an authorized capital of $300,000, divided into thirty thousand shares with a par value of $10 each. The three defendants constituted the hoard of directors and were elected officers of the corporation.

Pursuant to an application to the Department of Investment, Division of Corporations, a permit was issued authorizing the corporation to issue not to exceed 100 of its shares to Jones, Mydland and Bay Heinz at par per share for cash. Pursuant to this permit 80 shares were issued to Jones who was president and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.