Pittman

Pittman v. Superior Court

Good Law
1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 1922·256 Cal. App. 2d 795·64 Cal. Rptr. 473
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 11, 1967Civ. 32098California1,296 words

Opinion

Opinion

Files, J.

By information petitioner was charged with two offenses: count I, a violation of Penal Code section 245, subdivision (b) (assault with a deadly weapon upon a peace officer); count II, a violation of Penal Code section 330 (gaming) . Before pleading, petitioner moved the superior court to dismiss both counts, pursuant to Penal Code section 995, upon the ground that he had been committed without reasonable or probable cause. That motion was denied. Thereupon petitioner commenced this proceeding under Penal Code section 999a for a review of that decision.

The magistrate’s commitment is based entirely upon the testimony of a single witness, Deputy Sheriff Barrier, which is here summarized.

At about 12:20 a.m. on June 10, 1967, Deputy Barrier and five other officers of the vice detail approached a vacant house at which they had been told (by informants not identified in the record) that there would be gambling. Through the windows the officers observed six men playing “a low ball stud game ’ ’ with cards. They forced entry, without prior warning, because their informants had said that those who had played cards there in the past had been armed, and the officers believed their lives…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.